Mount Hood

Students make voices heard

IFC Graphic (pie chart)

By: Conner Williams
Editor-in-Chief

Facing a plethora of funding cuts and a potential $14 increase in the quarterly incidental fee, a group of Western students gathered in the WUC’s Pacific Room to join in on the discussion with the Incidental Fee Committee.

Preliminary decisions have set the fee to increase to $341 per term for the 2016-2017 academic year, nearly 4 percent more than the current year’s fee.

The committee is comprised of students, faculty members, and administrators and has the responsibility of determining the amount of funding that the clubs and organizations at Western receive. They do so by analyzing current budgetary needs for each department and then decide on a fee that each Western student must pay each quarter. Open hearings allow students and members of the Western community to speak directly to the committee about their concerns.

Jacob Higgins, a third year biology major, attended the hearing on Feb. 22 to advocate for the Natural Science Club and to give his thoughts on the fee itself.

“I guess the way to prevent the cuts is to add to the fee,” said Higgins. “But I think that if [the IFC] would explain what [the fee] was and that it benefits every student, people would be willing to understand that it’s not a big deal.”

Higgins said that the funds allow the club to take several students on trips for spring break each year, and he hopes that those trips will continue.

“The club is important to me. We have staff members come and speak to us about a bunch of different subjects, and that helps us learn as well,” he said.

Holli Howard-Carpenter, head coach for Western’s women’s basketball team, said that the current funding makes it difficult for the team when they have to travel for away games.

“We only have 12 on our roster, but we’re only funded to travel 10” […] “We have to fundraise for the remainder of that so that everyone can travel,” Howard-Carpenter said.

Jasmine Miller, a sophomore education major and guard for the women’s basketball team, reiterated the notion that a reduced budget causes complications for athletes on the road.

“When you go to a restaurant you only have $10” Miller said. “Today, like what can you really get for ten dollars? […] You have to fuel yourself to perform right and it’s hard to do that sometimes on the budget that you have.”

Miller then noted that funding for athletics benefits the entire student body, not just the athletes.

“We want to get enrollment up in the school, so that these funds are not as much of an issue,” she said. “If we’re able to go and travel to these tournaments and wear our new gear and look right and represent our school, it’s going to help everybody, not just the girls’ basketball program.”

“We’re here to help everyone, that’s what we want to do,” Miller said.

Lilaah Jones, a third year gerontology major, said that sports teams should have to do more fundraising for themselves rather than receive increased funding from IFC.

“I know that a lot of clubs here are doing fundraising, and I don’t see other sports doing that,” Jones said. “I’m in the WUC a lot, so I see all kinds of clubs tabling and fundraising.”

“As a student, it’s hard to see what sports are doing to raise money for themselves,” Jones said.

Jones then noted that an increase in the fee makes it difficult for students that attend Western because of its relatively cheap price tag.

“I know that as a first generation college student, [Western] is a good choice financially. I don’t want this fee to be a reason that someone can’t afford to go here,” Jones said.

Emmi Collier, a senior exercise science major with a focus in P.E., said that she understands the burden that the committee itself has when deciding on the fee for each year. Collier also throws for Western’s track team.

“They have a really hard decision because they have to take a lot of money from every single student and put it towards programs that benefit that specific student or programs that benefit other students,” Collier said. “I think that’s a really hard job and I give them kudos.”

“I think for right now they have a pretty sufficient process. I really love that they do the open hearings and they actually get the student input because I think that’s a really big deal,” Collier said.

Sam Stageman, a junior forensic chemistry major and representative from the Triangle Alliance, agreed that the open hearings are beneficial for students.

“It’s really nice to hear how each organization is helping out all the different students,” Stageman said. “They’re not just cutting wildly and all that, they’re actually wanting our input and that’s great.”

Currently, preliminary decisions call for a total increase of $67, 997 in the IFC budget from last year, plus an additional $4,777 with enhancements, bringing the total IFC budget for the 2016-2017 academic year to $4,378,474.

Three IFC-funded organizations have currently been approved for enhancement requests. 13 departments are set to receive cuts, three will gain additional funding, and three will remain the same, as per the preliminary decisions.

Contact the author at journaleditor@wou.edu or on Twitter @journalEIC.

Managing Editor Katrina Penaflor contributed to this report.

Thief-like malware says “pay up”

By: Conner Williams
Editor in Chief

An unnamed individual has lost all of the data in their personal and departmental drives connected to Western’s server when the machine in use was infected with a computer virus.

According to an email notification from Michael Ellis, assistant director of University Computing Services at Western, the user was browsing a beer site that had advertisements on the page that “pointed to infected webpages in Switzerland.”

Ellis noted that the virus, formally referred to as “Ransomware,” used vulnerability in Adobe Flash player to download the virus onto the machine. Ransomware then laid dormant for several hours and began encrypting files late into the evening. In the morning, the user logged onto their machine and found a pop up note that explained what happened and asked for a ransom amount in order to unlock the files, or else they would be deleted within 24 hours. The requested ransom amount was not specified in the email.

All of the user’s files in their H drive and I drive were lost, but UCS reported that they were able to restore all network files to previous versions after a lengthy process. Ellis reported in the email that the UCS security infrastructure blocks about 400 intrusion attempts per hour.

UCS then gave several pieces of advice for protecting one’s files:

1. Don’t store files on your local machine – desktop or C drive. Use the H and I drive for all documents.
2. Never click on a link sent in an email, unless you know the person that sent it.
3. Do not use your office computer to browse sites of a personal nature
4. Avoid using Internet Explorer as much as possible. UCS recommends the use of Chrome and Firefox as primary browsers.
5. If you see a strange message or pop up on the screen, do not click on it.

For more information, contact the UCS service desk at (503) 838-8925

Contact the author at journaleditor@wou.edu or on Twitter @journalEIC

Scalia’s successor: to nominate, or not to nominate?

By: Alvin Wilson
Staff Writer

President Obama found himself in an unusual situation after Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia died on Feb. 13.

When there is a vacancy in the Supreme Court, the president nominates a successor to be approved by the Senate. Some presidents, such as Ronald Reagan, appointed as many as two Justices.

Obama has already appointed two Justices during his time as president: Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

What makes his situation unusual is that a vacancy in the Supreme Court appeared in his last year as President.

The most recent time this occurred was in 1988, when Reagan nominated Justice Anthony Kennedy during his last year as President.

With the unexpected death of Scalia, Obama now has the opportunity to nominate a third Justice—something that conservatives in the Senate think he shouldn’t do.

Obama’s authority to nominate another Justice is outlined in Article II of the Constitution, which is also known as the Appointment Clause.

Many Republican leaders have been vocal about their disapproval, saying that he shouldn’t be able to nominate another Supreme Court Justice despite the Appointment Clause.

According to NPR, Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R) said the vacancy should not be filled until there is a new president.

Although some Republican leaders, including presidential candidates, have displayed their unwillingness to confirm any nominations made by Obama, others have said they will at least consider any nomination he will make.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R) told the Washington Post that he would “wait until the nominee is made before I would make any decision,” adding that he doesn’t want the Republican party to “fall into the trap of being obstructionist.”

The Senate has the last word when it comes to nominations to the Supreme Court, so they can, in fact, deny Obama’s nomination.

One way the Senate can deny a nomination is by refusing to hear it. If the nomination isn’t debated, it can’t be confirmed.

Another way they can deny it is by allowing the Senate Judiciary Committee to hear the nomination and vote against it—which is a real possibility because the committee has a Republican majority.

If neither of those options work, or aren’t appealing enough, Senators can block the nominee from proceeding to a final vote by filibustering.

It is still unclear which method, if any, they will choose.

Contact the author at awilson15@wou.edu or on Twitter @awilsonjournal

Western talks equality with Merkley

By: Alvin Wilson 
Staff Writer

Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) visited Western’s Werner University Center on Feb. 5 to discuss his new bill, the Equality Act, with a small audience of students.

According to Merkley’s website, “The Equality Act amends existing federal civil rights laws to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity in education, employment, housing, credit, and Federal jury service.”

Merkley’s visit started with a story about the events that eventually led to him writing the Equality Act.

In 2013, Merkley helped lead the effort to pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act in Congress.

“During that battle, it was really interesting because it was very hostile, very emotional,” said Merkley. “I remember driving into the underground parking at the Capitol and having people kind of tap on my windshield, hold up placards to my windshield, yell and scream at me, tell me what a horrible person I was.”

“But I felt like a very good person,” he continued. “I felt this was the right thing not just in terms of our constitutional vision of fairness, opportunity and equality, but in terms of fundamental human rights.”

But that bill didn’t pass because the House of Representatives refused to debate it on the floor.

“The House of Representatives was led by the other party, the Republican party, which was not willing to do this,” said Merkley. “We felt that we had the votes in the House of Representatives, but to win the vote it has to be held, and the leadership of the house refused to do so.”

This prompted Merkley to write a new piece of legislation.

“We decided it was time to talk differently about this,” he said. “It was time not to talk about chipping away here or there, it was time to simply say our LGBT community deserves the same fundamental laws against discrimination that are enjoyed by Americans in regard to gender, ethnicity, and race.

“The bill that I wrote is about utilizing the 1964 Civil Rights Act as a foundation.”

The Equality Act already has 40 cosponsors, but it hasn’t passed yet.

“I don’t think that my Republican majority colleagues are going to hold a hearing on the bill,” said Merkley. “So, what are we doing in the meantime? We are building a stronger coalition.”

He said they are recruiting companies to endorse the bill, and they already have 20 Fortune 500 companies on board.

“We’d like that to be 200 Fortune 500 companies,” he said.

Merkley said one Republican recently agreed to cosponsor the bill.

“Mark Kirk of Illinois, who had been a partner of mine with the Non-Discrimination Act, endorsed it,” he said. “So, we can now call it a bipartisan bill.”

So, what’s next for the Equality Act?

“Really, the next step right now is building awareness of it, getting citizens to lobby their house and senate members to become cosponsors, and getting the corporate world to endorse it,” said Merkley.

End to negotiation draws near

By: Alvin Wilson 
Staff Writer

Negotiations have been winding down as President Rex Fuller and his negotiating team look for ways to settle with WOUFT.

Fuller has been criticized by the union for not yielding in his effort to keep the operating revenue above 15 percent. Because of the volatile nature of university revenue streams, Fuller said they are still trying to stay within the boundaries they previously set.

“University funding really only consists of two components these days,” said Fuller. “One would be the state funding, which is based upon state allocation, and the other is tuition. Tuition accounts for a greater percent today than it did 40 years ago, so it does matter.”

The university compiles information about future state funding, projected enrollment rates, tuition rates, and other expenses, and then bases budgetary decisions off of the projections.

Tuition is expected to increase by three percent every year. Enrollment is expected to be flat next year, but by 2018 it is expected to begin increasing again.

“Even with those three percent forecasts, and even with enrollment growth reversing the trend, we start to have a situation where we begin to erode into our 15 percent reserve,” said Fuller.

The 2016 Operating Budget for Western includes everything in the university’s most current proposal, and it shows Western’s operating revenue falling below 15 percent by next year.

Fuller and his negotiating team both see this as a risk, but Fuller believes it will be worth it, saying “I believe that gives us time to rebuild the enrollment pipeline. The bet I’m making as a president, if you will, is that we’ll actually exceed these enrollment figures.”

Fuller said that there’s a problem with most of the school’s funds coming from tuition, since the Western Promise has locked in the tuition rates for about half of the students.

This means that when the university increases tuition rates, it will be hard to predict how much of an increase in funding it will bring.

“Therein lies the financial risk, which is part of the reason why we have the 15 percent reserve,” said Fuller.

Fuller admits that a compromise must be made to settle with WOUFT, but he doesn’t agree with some of the claims the union has made about his side of the negotiations.

“I think one of the things that has been said is that the university is stalling,” said Fuller. “I would say that’s contrary to all the evidence I’ve seen.”

Fuller says that he and his negotiating team have been active in trying to resolve the negotiations from the beginning.

“We have changed proposals to be responsive to the concerns of the union,” he said. “We were prepared to go to mediation in January; the union was not.”

Fuller says the university is close to settling with WOUFT and that he is ready to consider any proposal they might offer.

“One of their emails said they believe that we could solve it within the amount of money on the table, and I stand ready to consider something we haven’t considered yet,” said Fuller. “We work on this every week—anytime that there’s an opportunity to adjust.”

Mark Perlman, president of WOUFT, says there is no risk of a faculty strike, suggesting that they are working on reaching an agreement as well.

Former WOU students convicted of rape and sexual abuse

RobertSavoyColorChristopherWeeklyColor

 

By: Jenna Beresheim
News Editor

Two male former Western Oregon University students were recently convicted of rape and sexual abuse of a female student in 2014.

According to the Statesman Journal, Robert Godeaux Savoy III, 23, was convicted of first-degree rape, first-degree sexual abuse, and third-degree sexual abuse.

Christopher James Weekly, 23, was convicted of first-degree sodomy, first-degree sexual abuse, second-degree sexual abuse, and third-degree sexual abuse.

The two-day trial took place in the Polk County Circuit Court before Judge Norman Hill.
Both first degree rape and first degree sodomy are considered Measure 11 offenses, and as such they carry mandatory minimum prison sentences of eight years and four months.

Both Savoy and Weekly are not considered students at Western as of 2014 and are being held in Polk County Jail.

Their official sentencing took place Feb. 11 at 4 p.m. in Polk County Circuit Court.

“In my role, I feel that justice is being served for this victim,” admitted Dr. Mary Ellen Dello Stritto, the Director of Abby’s House on Western’s campus.

“We’re the victim advocates here, it’s a positive outcome,” continued Dello Stritto.

Abby’s House is a resource and referral site on campus that supports individuals in any trouble they are experiencing in their life. Some examples listed were sexual harassment, pregnancy, mental health, stalking, housing, substance abuse, LGBT*Q issues, and more.

There are currently fourteen trained student advocates to respond to crises by supporting an individual, aiding them in considering their options, and allowing them to make educated choices about the next step in handling the issue at hand.

“Our assistant director Andrea Hugmeyer, and myself are confidential advocates who can support a victim without needing to be mandatory reporters,” said Dello Stritto, “that’s something we can offer, whereas our student advocates are still mandatory reporters.”

Abby’s House is a non-discriminatory safe zone for all students that is open Mondays and Wednesdays from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. the other three days.

“We’re here to support survivors – which means all students, survivors are men as well,” encouraged Dello Stritto.

Another campus support system that works closely with Abby’s House is the Student Health and Counseling Center.

“Our professional staff provides students at WOU with quality primary health care, information, referral services, counseling, and educational services,” said Jaime Silva, Director of the Student Health and Counseling Center.

“In situations of rape and sexual assault, we provide students with compassionate, confidential, and supportive services to help them feel validated and also to help them make informed decisions about their situation,” continued Silva.

The Student Health and Counseling Center is open during school hours from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and offers emergency appointments as well as a host of resources and hotlines for support during weekends or closed hours.

“We talk to students about the resources available to them and help them be in as much control of their situation as possible,” said Silva.

One final resource, as means of prevention, can be found in the on-campus club Green Dot.
“A green dot is any behavior, choice, word, or attitude that promotes safety for everyone and communicates utter intolerance for sexual violence, partner violence and stalking,” reports the Green Dot website.

Green Dot offers multiple trainings to aid in prevention of these intolerances, as well as hosting weekly club meetings.

For more information regarding Green Dot, contact club president Dacota Ashwill at dashwill12@mail.wou.edu.

“Turning the Tide” on college admissions

By: Katrina Penaflor 
Managing Editor

The expectation levels for college admissions varies across the field. Typically, schools take a balance of GPA, SAT or ACT scores, and an accumulation of extracurricular activities.

In a recent New York Times article, OP-ED writer Frank Bruni addressed a study titled “Turning the Tide,” which discussed the flaws in the college admission process, primarily at the Ivy-League level. He went on to say how a university’s expectations and approval process may not benefit students at every income level.

Western’s application process, in comparison to non-Ivy-League or private universities, is primarily standard, meaning that when a student applies, Western takes into account their transcript, SAT or ACT scores, and a completed application.

SAT and ACT scores are not required for the WOU admissions process if the universities GPA requirement of 2.75 is met, but they are beneficial for scholarship purposes.

Like Western, “a growing number of colleges have made the SAT or ACT optional,” said Bruni in his article.

“Some of those alterations would simultaneously level the playing field for kids applying to college from less advantaged backgrounds,” said Bruni, who continued to point out the correlation between household income and standardized test scores.

An additional point “Turning the Tide” made was the negative effects college admissions have on high school students.

Not only can they cause a heavy workload with additional Advanced Placement (A.P.) courses—which are not available in all high schools—and extracurricular activities, but the pressure of becoming an ideal candidate can bring increased anxiety.

“Poorer high schools aren’t as likely to offer A.P. courses, and a heavy load of them is often cited as a culprit in sleep deprivation, anxiety and depression among students at richer schools,” said Bruni.

Western has tried to combat the stressful application process by heading directly to high schools and having students apply in an environment familiar to them.

“Something that we do to make it more convenient, and reduce that stress and make it more WOU focused, is we do instant Wolf onsite,” said Luanne Carrillo, admissions counselor and multicultural recruitment coordinator.

This means the university will work with the students’ counselors and faculty to ensure the necessary paperwork is acquired and the students only worry about their application and application fee.

This provides the opportunity for any questions about the processes to be directly answered and students will receive an admissions decision the same day.

Possible changes or reassessments can even go back to what is acceptable on a high school level.

Carrillo suggests, “looking back at the high school concept and saying ‘should you all still offer D’s?’ because D’s are not passing for a university.”

As “Turning the Tide” suggests, finding well-rounded students goes beyond the number of club activities and SAT scores. It is a university’s job to see how their admissions requirements can shape the behavior of potential students, and if that is happening in a positive or negative fashion.